The NBA has seen a dramatic transition in the last decade, with the three-point shot becoming the most dominant offensive weapon. As of the 2024-25 season, a stunning 42% of all field goal attempts were made from beyond the arc. This considerable rise has spurred heated debate among players, coaches, pundits, and fans about the impact of this change on the game’s overall dynamics.
The Evolution of the Three-Point Shot
The three-point line, introduced in 1979, was initially considered as a novelty. Early on, teams rarely used it since traditional basketball strategies favored high-percentage shots near the basket. However, this began to alter in the 2010s, owing primarily to the effect of analytic and players such as Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson, and James Harden. The “Moreyball” ideology, named after former Houston Rockets general manager Daryl Morey, advocated shooting shots at the rim or beyond the arc, which have a higher anticipated value than mid-range efforts.
Stephen Curry: The Catalyst of the Revolution
Stephen Curry of the Golden State Warriors is widely regarded as the key trigger for this turnaround. His extraordinary shooting range, rapid release, and high efficiency transformed offensive strategy around the league. Curry’s success sparked a copycat effect, with teams urging their guards, wings, and even centers to acquire three-point shooting skills.
Impact on Game Dynamics
The increased emphasis on three-pointers has significantly changed game dynamics:
Space and Ball Movement: The greater spacing caused by perimeter shooting has generated more driving lanes and improved ball movement. Teams are now prioritizing athletes who can spread the floor, regardless of position.
Defenses have adjusted: By using more aggressive closeouts and switching strategies.
Defensive specialists: Such as Jrue Holiday and Mikal Bridges have become well-known for their ability to guard several perimeter spots.
Reduced Post-Play: Big guys like Joel Embiid and Nikola Jokichave extended their three-point range, reducing traditional low-post scoring.
The Corner Three Debate
Recent discussions have centered on the corner three-point shot. This shot is more efficient since it is shorter (22 feet vs. 23.75 feet from the top of the key). Coaches create plays particularly to free up shooters in the corners, resulting in one of the most efficient shots in basketball. However, some purists believe that this disparity undermines the game’s integrity. The NBA has considered changing the court size to lessen the effectiveness of the corner three. Proposals include:
Extend the Corner Arc: Align the corner distance with the remainder of the three-point line.
Introducing the Four-Point Line: A daring approach for balancing defensive strategies and restoring shot diversity.
The Future Of Three-Point Shooting
Looking ahead, the future of three-point shooting remains unknown. While teams continue to push the boundaries, the NBA may make rule modifications to ensure a balanced and diverse style of play. Regardless of future changes, the three-point revolution has permanently altered the way basketball is played and seen.
“The NBA’s three-point revolution, led by stars such as Stephen Curry, has transformed the game, increasing efficiency while raising arguments over court design and game dynamics”.
